Why is it that when you bring your ear up to a graduate student's paper that copiously quotes Deleuze you can always hear the sea?
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) May 5, 2013
No student should quote Deleuze who hasn't entirely read at least five of his books and been reading him for at least five years...
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) May 5, 2013
... Failing this, they should just quote the Celestial Seasonings teabags they treat him as anyway.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) May 5, 2013
Reading Deleuze is not an education, it's a massage. Without release.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) May 5, 2013
Describing oneself as a "Deleuzian" is like declaring oneself a "Johnny Carsonian." Only fancying oneself "Zizekian" would be worse.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) May 5, 2013
Those who read only Deleuze require the delousing procedure of reading the writers he writes about. Distracting an itch isn't scratching it.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) May 5, 2013
> Those who read only Deleuze require the delousing
ReplyDelete> procedure of reading the writers he writes about.
You make it sound althusserious.