Sunday, November 25, 2012

You Are Not A Picture of You

Brain emulation cheerleaders and uploading enthusiasts, please make a note of it.

More Futurological Brickbats here.

2 comments:

  1. I was reading recently that there's a computational model
    of the internal combustion engine that apparently requires
    (or at least "deserves") the current biggest supercomputer
    in the world to run.

    I don't think putting the supercomputer in a car would
    actually propel it down the road, though. The car, that
    is. (Or the supercomputer, for that matter.)

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2012/04/120430-titan-supercomputing-for-energy-efficiency/
    -----------------
    Neon lines and dots of aqua, violet, crimson, and pink
    dissolve into smoky swirls—that's what the burning of fuel
    looks like when it is simulated on one of the world's
    most powerful supercomputers.

    These psychedelic snapshots could pave the way for the
    development of cars that use 25 percent to 50 percent
    less fuel than the autos of today. But the problem
    of improving upon the 150-year-old internal combustion
    engine is so complex that the scientists who work
    on it are eager for a major development in the supercomputing
    world to occur later this year. The U.S. Department
    of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Tennessee
    is set to deploy a massive upgrade to Jaguar, the nation's
    fastest supercomputer and Number 3 in the world. The
    new system, called Titan, is expected to work at twice
    the speed of the machine that is currently the fastest
    supercomputer in the world, Japan's K computer.
    -----------------

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/10/29/oak_ridge_titan_supercomputer/print.html

    Supercomputers sure get **tacky** paint jobs these days!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Where is it I read that chemists and physicists who prefer
    to mess about with the "real world" disparage what the
    simulation folks do as "type and hype", where as the latter
    disparage the former as "shake and bake"?

    ;->

    ReplyDelete