Thursday, January 05, 2012

Weirdgate Debate! Is Romney a Weird Mormon Guy Or a Weird Rich Guy?

Efforts to put a finger on what it might be that just seems so darned weird about Willard Romney have been dismissed by Romney's Hu-mon surrogates as nothing but coded signals of anti-mormon bigotry. Indeed, BooMan raises a few questions of the ways in which Willard might be weird in a weird mormonic mode. I freely admit as a crusty atheist that I find all the various UFO cults rather weird, Trekkers, Raelians, Scientologists, Mormons, Roman Catholics and so on. I am of course highly informed on such matters, having studiously watched South Park for years.

But, I also have to say that for me personally it is Willard's long inhabitation of a bubble of moneyed hyper-privilege that yields that abiding strange stiff inhumanity of his. Think of Glinda the Good Witch descending on the Emerald City, bathed in pastels, smiling vapidly like an anti-depressant commercial, clearly strung tight as a banjo string. Watching Romney interact with average Hu-mons in group settings is like observing a social variation of the uncanny valley. I am reminded of William Gibson's insight expressed in the gooseflesh inducing phrase from Count Zero:
And, for an instant, she stared directly into those soft blue eyes and knew, with an instinctive mammalian certainty, that the exceedingly rich were no longer even remotely human.

4 comments:

  1. > Watching Romney interact with average Hu-mons in group settings is
    > like observing a social variation of the uncanny valley. I am reminded
    > of the William Gibson's Count Zero insight expressed in the gooseflesh
    > inducing phrase. . .

    Golly!

    ReplyDelete
  2. What, too much? wheeee!

    ReplyDelete
  3. > What, too much?

    Au contraire! South Park and William Gibson just hit the spot.

    ;->

    ReplyDelete
  4. > I freely admit as a crusty atheist that I find all the various UFO cults
    > rather weird, Trekkers, Raelians, Scientologists, Mormons, Roman Catholics
    > and so on.

    Here's one I can believe in:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/01/05/file_sharing_sweden_kopimism_religion/
    ---------------------
    Sweden has acknowledged that online file-sharing can be deemed
    a religion. . .

    The Church of Kopimism was apparently registered by the Swedish
    governmental agency Kammarkollegiet. . ..

    According to a statement from the Kopimists themselves, the pro-piracy
    outfit's church was recognised as a religious org "just before Christmas". . .

    All of the kopimi are apparently grateful that Sweden has become
    the first country to recognise that file-sharing is in fact a religion.

    Some might draw comparisons with the controversial Church of Scientology,
    which is recognised principally in the US as a religion, and also with Jediism,
    which is yet to be decreed as a faith by anyone on planet Earth.
    ---------------------

    There seems to be more of a point to this than, e.g.,
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibology

    I wonder how this could play out in an RIAA or MPAA
    lawsuit in a Swedish court.

    ;->

    ReplyDelete