tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5956838.post160381514244530050..comments2023-11-22T01:14:54.298-08:00Comments on amor mundi: Amor LectionisDale Carricohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02811055279887722298noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5956838.post-55146968785295639512015-03-18T17:05:02.542-07:002015-03-18T17:05:02.542-07:00Please don't take it personally, I was just st...Please don't take it personally, I was just struck by the way this seemed to be part of both responses to my critique -- and this is the latest in a long string of charges (much more insistent than yours, believe me) of this kind questioning the seriousness, honesty, elitism, and so on of my rhetorical emphasis. I hoped taking the snippet out of context actually emphasized its positive force, setting aside what might be defensive about it in context. Best to you, d Dale Carricohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02811055279887722298noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5956838.post-43315569121444092812015-03-18T16:43:20.772-07:002015-03-18T16:43:20.772-07:00I can of course only speak for my self in this mat...I can of course only speak for my self in this matter. But my "accusation" about you doing rhetorical "game" might have been me using the wrong word and therefore quite logically you misunderstood my point. What I meant by "rhetorical game" referred to the specific article where you make a mention about (left) anarchism in the question of racism where I felt you emphasised to much on the spontaneity claim rather than the fact that there are and have been (left) anarchist writers who have written about the subject instead insisting that the problem fixes it self by removing government. Though as I know in our following debates what you generally mean by the "spontaneist" side of (left) anarchism, I have not felt the idea of commenting on. After all, even though I can not claim the similar education, I still have read and is influenced by similar writers. <br /><br />The Sokal affair has always seemed strange for me since I have only heard about. I was five years of age when it happened. Thers has never been a time when I did not read Quine alongside Deleuze or Russell alongside Foucault or William James alongside Sartre. <br /> Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05812503574018469872noreply@blogger.com