tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5956838.post1031863906537575582..comments2023-11-22T01:14:54.298-08:00Comments on amor mundi: "The Future" As PrologueDale Carricohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02811055279887722298noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5956838.post-22439791488012365462008-12-15T07:41:00.000-08:002008-12-15T07:41:00.000-08:00I predict the square will be circled.I predict the square will be circled.Dale Carricohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02811055279887722298noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5956838.post-81774230321770767242008-12-14T23:58:00.000-08:002008-12-14T23:58:00.000-08:00Now, Dale, I'm curious about something here. This ...Now, Dale, I'm curious about something here. This is just a particular point on something you've said, so superlative technocentricities aside; I've noticed that you've gone out of your way at various times to trash the idea of "mind uploading".<BR/><BR/>Now this has confused me; are you actually making a prediction here or are you just getting at something rhetorically? For instance, in this post you say:<BR/><BR/>"<I>mind-uploading is actually incoherent</I>"<BR/><BR/>By this do you mean to get at the absurdity of <I>predicting mind uploading</I>, or are you actually going out of your way to <I>predict against mind uploading</I>?<BR/><BR/>If you <I>are in fact</I> predicting against mind uploading, on what are you basing your prediction?<BR/><BR/>And before you knock me on missing the point of this post, I didn't <I>actually</I> miss it (I'm pretty sure), I'm just curious about this tendency to specify what appear to me to be predictions on this subject.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com