tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5956838.post302287067482289208..comments2023-11-22T01:14:54.298-08:00Comments on amor mundi: Priestly FuturistsDale Carricohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02811055279887722298noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5956838.post-810063607877908292015-09-09T14:41:11.454-07:002015-09-09T14:41:11.454-07:00Nato, my friend! Good to hear from you!Nato, my friend! Good to hear from you!Dale Carricohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02811055279887722298noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5956838.post-9409006434052136002015-09-09T13:30:00.902-07:002015-09-09T13:30:00.902-07:00https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_Religion
"...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_Religion<br /><br />"This article is about the clothing brand. For the religious concept, see One true faith"<br /><br />Seeing "True Religion" as a brand on clothing, always ties my brain in knots. Is the branding not religion at all because it's marketing? Or is the brand a bona fide religion because, well, that's all religion really is? If the latter is the case, does the hint of inauthenticity brought about by prepending the term "True" (as in "No true Scotsman") intended to suggest that religion isn't marketing, or that marketing isn't religion?<br /><br />--Nato<br />(Yep, I'm still reading. Sorry I missed this when it was first posted.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5956838.post-71548362412839507222015-06-14T07:09:41.117-07:002015-06-14T07:09:41.117-07:00The more I read philosophical history the more I s...The more I read philosophical history the more I start to realise just how unimaginative futurology (and it's sub species) are.<br /><br />What is the difference between the shamwow guy and a futurologist on a basiv level? I mean really. I want that explained to me because I maybe too dumb not to see a difference.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05812503574018469872noreply@blogger.com